🔗 Share this article

The Republic of South Africa's supreme judicial authority has without dissent decided that every caregiver of newborn children are granted identical parenting time - a landmark decision recognized as a significant win for fair treatment and household entitlements.

Present Legal Inequality

Based on the current law, birth mothers are provided one-third of a year of time off, while fathers get just 10 days.

In its ruling, the supreme tribunal stated parts of the legislation invalid, labeling it discriminatory against dads, and determined that both parents may now divide the provided absence however they choose.

"This constitutes a revolutionary advancement for equal treatment, parental health, and the destiny of parenting in the nation," commented Sthembiso Phakathi, creator of a fathers' organization.

Legal Background

In 2023, a trial court found particular parts of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act and the insurance law unfair and ruled that they violated the entitlements of different household types.

The Gauteng High Court then determined that the legislation showed bias toward types of parents unequally regarding the length of parental leave and financial support granted.

Court Proceedings

The lawsuit was brought to court by a married couple, the Commission for Gender Equality and other petitioners, who aimed to correct the unfair societal burden mainly affecting mothers, highlighting that childcare duties should be divided.

The petitioners argued that the present regulations showed bias against mothers and fathers who were not the birth mother - specifically, dads, adoptive parents, and parents of babies delivered by surrogates - by allowing them only 10 days of caregiver absence, while the birth mother received four months.

Legal Reasoning

Announcing the ruling on Friday, Justice Zukisa Tshiqi declared that mothers and fathers should be granted share the provided period as they deemed appropriate, describing the current law obsolete and one which "unequally pressured female parents and marginalized dads".

"The protection of delivering parents to the omission of additional caregivers has the detrimental effect of continuing the presumption that females are, and should be, the main guardians of children.

"The dad is marginalised and denied the opportunity to involve himself as a guardian in the nurturing of the newborn during the early stages of life," she stated further.

Justice Tshiqi commented the ruling was not only about fair treatment but also about protecting the honor of households, emphasising that the primary concern of the legal determination was the welfare of babies.

"The unequal treatment not just excludes guardians but also deprives children of the opportunity to be with their guardians during a important phase of nurturing and acclimatization to their new environment."

Feedback and Ramifications

The applicants celebrated the judgment, while jurists warned that the decision would have significant consequences for companies, who will have to modify their present time-off regulations to comply with the judgement.

"The core of the case is that it underscores the requirement to offer identical parental leave benefits, recognizing that caring for a baby is a collective task," an official from the equality body informed the press.

He stated the existing legislation "did not reflect evolving societal norms around child-rearing".

Employment attorney an expert stated to state media that the judgment was "a positive and expected outcome" for caregiver entitlements in the nation.

Application Schedule

The judicial body has delayed its ruling of unconstitutionality for three years, providing the legislature time to change the present regulations to comply with its decision.

In the meantime, mothers and fathers will be entitled to determine how they want to share the specified period of leave.

When just one caregiver is working, that parent may use the complete time off allowance.